Population Growth Causes Poverty :: Expository Cause Effect Essays

Everywhere in the world, in every kind of culture, the poorest passel have the most children. Does having many children make people poor? Or does world poor make people have many children?That is a hot question in the continuous struggle over how to spend foreign upkeep money. Those who think population growth causes poverty advocate programs in family planning and population education. Those who think poverty causes population growth favor direct sparing aid, jobs, capital investment. Take care of development, they say, and the kind rate will take care of itself.Advocates of both sides have come to the village of Manupur in the province of Punjab in north India to prove themselves right.There is nothing special about Manupur. It is a typical Indian village, with a population in 1950 of about 1200, mostly farmers. Its people are not well off, though their lives are slowly improving. New seeds, fertilizers, and credit systems have caused wheat yields to quadruple since 1950.In 19 53 a team from the Harvard shallow of Public Health came to Manupur to try out one of the worlds first family planning programs. They visited all homes regularly, took a census, registered all births and deaths. They also instructed people about modern methods of birth control and handed out free contraceptives.The Harvard team expected that the birth rate would fall. The Punjabis were rural, poor and uneducated. They had an average of seven children per family. Many young people migrated to the city to find jobs the ones who stayed inherited smaller and smaller plots of land. Surely if families knew how to prevent having so many children, they would have fewer.The people of Manupur politely accepted the contraceptive foams and jellies. At the set about of the Harvard study their birth rate was about 40 babies per 1000 people per year. Six years later the birth rate had gone down a little, to 37.7. But the birth rate had also gone down all over the Punjab, even where there were n o family planning programs.The Harvard researchers concluded that the villagers were not so ignorant after all. Family size had always been controlled with crude methods such as abstinence and self-induced abortion. Increasing prosperity caused people to want smaller families, because there was little need for children to work in the fields or support parents in their old age. Once that happened, birth rates went down. Modern contraceptives helped them go down much easily and quickly.